The following is a picture of an artwork that is reported to come from the bilderberg private art collection. To me it clearly represents the symbol of the illuminati which is the pyramid, the worship of the sun at the pinnacle and the enslavement of the whole earth flowing from the thrown. The shocking thing to me is that they no longer even attempt to hide their intentions.
This is a painting I made in 2012. I love it because I work in obstetrics and I wanted to show my perception of the places the mind goes when we are completely stripped of everything. The place where all that we have and all we have done is erased and we are completely born again. My husband actually hates the painting and every time I find it, He says it’s creepy. Apparently, God feels differently because the people I have shown it to, several have burst into tears over the loss of a child or some painful event. This has led them to be delivered from some of the pain of loss and remorse they were suffering.
I believe there is healing power in art if we tap into it. This is prophetic art.
He received his doctorate in theology and was ordained, traveled 8 countries and became a respected systematic theology professor before age 25. As he began to rise in the world of academia, his country is being taken over by a powerful dictator. So powerful was this dictator, that he has since been called a “type of the antichrist”. In a few short years he saw his country go through drastic changes, growing more and more intolerant of the religious establishment, a rise in occultism, persecution of Jewish citizens and without mercy towards those that speak out against the party or the party leader. As the political party and the dictator who led it became more and more violent towards it’s citizens, he took to the airwaves to call upon his countrymen to resist this power.
Within a few short years, the dictator took over not only the country, but also the church itself making sure that only supporters of his party got positions of leadership in the church and demanding that all the churches swear allegiance to the dictator. At age 27 he was raising support for the “intact” churches in other countries. At the same time he was also raising up opposition to the evil “anti-christ” that was consolidating power in his country.
Given the opportunity to put his country behind him and make a new life in another country far from the problems and dangers at home, he instead choose to jump back into the jaws of danger. Returning home, he begins establishing underground churches for those that refuse to bend their knee to the “anti-christ” dictator and even begins an underground seminary. At 31 he writes one of the most important works of theology of all time, while leaders of his church are being arrested for opposing the ruling party.
For the second time given an opportunity to flee to a safer country, he chooses instead to not only stay, but to work with a resistance group as a spy and courier. Their goal was to attempt to assassinate this “anti-christ” and bring down the party that supports him. At the same time he is involved with groups that help Jewish people escape genocide.
Inevitably he is arrested, but he still continues sharing Christ with his guards and fellow prisoners and even leads Sunday services in the prison. When darkness seemed to have beaten him, he continues encourage his former students in their work of being faithful to the Gospel. This man was so filled with the spirit of God that he was offered help escaping by a guard, but he declines so that the man’s family will be safe. Finally, after preaching his last sermon, he is led away and hanged days before the fall of the evil dictator and his political party.
This man’s name is Dietrich Bonhoeffer, his country is Germany and the dictator he opposed is Hitler. Although 2 generations have passed between then and now, I think we have few modern day examples of how one should conduct themselves when the real Antichrist appears on the scene. Ultimately, there will be nowhere to run to, and those believers who are alive at this time should study Bonhoeffer’s example. We can draw conclusions from this story about the assault on the church during such a time. The way so many churches did not stand up for what they believed in during this time. The line between true believers in Christ and the weak willed or deceived believers became very apparent.
In the future there will come a time when brother will rise against brother (Mark 13:12) and a man’s enemy will be in his own household. We can also see that the verse may also be protecting a time when the church splits and brother rises against brother (in the church).
If you only read one biography in your life, this should be the one: Bonhoeffer; Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy (Eric Metaxis, 2010)
NASA: Humans Will Prove ‘We Are Not Alone In The Universe’ Within 20 Years: Prepare For The Strong Demonic Delusion
Times are so short, this message really needs to be shared
Dont forget to visit my new website and see what interesting news I have posted. If you go to google search you can connect to the website there or click on your search bar and type Thesechristiantimes.com. Thank you for all your support and God Bless You. I am working on trying to get my blog connected to my website or just click on link http://thesechristiantimes.com/ Please be patient as we move in a new direction.
Full disclosure is near. The day when the Alien Agenda is revealed across the planet will shake every religious beliefs of Christian, Muslims, and anyone that believes in God to the very core. How will the world leaders reveal this big revelation to the world? Some Christians believe that when this agenda is disclosed that an ultimate deception will be played out as a lie so big that it will have Biblical ramifications for…
View original post 541 more words
The word translated as “son’s of God” is also controversial so let’s look at it. the word bene ha elohim is used in Deut 32:8, Job 1:6, Job 38:7 and Psalm 29:1.
In Job 1:6 we find:
Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them.”
Some argue that this term is applied to all the angels in heaven and therefore it can refer to fallen angels and faithful angels alike. They use this argument to state that the angels who became “Nephilim” were not necessarily fallen and therefore both they and their offspring were not necessarily evil. Clearly this is a circular argument. If the angels went against the Lord’s will and mated with daughters of men, then they are clearly not in league with God.
Job 38:7 also mentions “son’s of God” as a blanket term for angels. Some argue this is because there are no fallen angels, there are only angels. This interpretation is clearly a stretch based off of this scripture. Ps 29:1 also instructs the “son’s of the mighty”( אֵל בֵּן.) to praise God. Again, this is a blanket name for angels or Godly people. Also this verse will eventually be fulfilled when “every knee shall bow, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord.
Some argue that you cannot interpret references to the “son of God” as referring to fallen angels because Jesus himself is called a “son of God” John 1:49-50, John 10:36-37, John 11:4, John 20:31. Again, this is a failure to understand the context. In Genesis 6, we see angels leaving heaven to mate with humans. In references to Jesus we see a loving God giving his only son to lay down his life to save his people.
In Rom 1:4 we read that all believers will become son’s of God through resurrection of the dead. Gal 4:6 also tells us that we have received sonship through adoption when we became believers. Rom 8:16 says the “Spirit testifies that we are God’s children”. Again look at the context. You have to see that rebellious angels having sexual relations with human females is a different context then believers being grafted and adopted in to becoming son’s of God.
Early Church Believers
Justin the Martyr (100’s AD) believed that the “son’s of God” mentioned in Gen 6 were fallen angels. In fact he also believed that Greek and Roman mythologies were making reference to fallen angels and their offspring:
But the angels transgressed this appointment, and were captivated by love of women, and begat children who are those that are called demons; and besides, they afterwards subdued the human race to themselves, partly by magical writings, and partly by fears and the punishments they occasioned, and partly by teaching them to offer sacrifices… Whence also the poets and mythologists, not knowing that it was the angels and those demons who had been begotten by them that did these things to men, and women, and cities, and nations, which they related, ascribed them to god himself, and to those who were accounted to be his very offspring, and to the offspring of those who were called his brothers, Neptune and Pluto, and to the children again of these their offspring. For whatever name each of the angels had given to himself and his children, by that name they called them“. Justin Marty Second Apology
Yes, here it is clear that some of the earliest Christian believers actually thought that the Greek and Roman gods were actually fallen angels and the decedents of their offspring with human women.
Irenaeus, Athenagoras, Tertullian, Lactantius, Eusebius, and Ambrose also believed that Nephilim were fallen angels and not decedents of Cain or Seth. In fact, the belief that the Nephilim are anything other than fallen angels didn’t surface until the 5th century (St Augustine). This view was also accepted by Josephus:
“For many angels (11- This notion, that the fallen angels were, in some sense, the fathers of the old giants, was the constant opinion of antiquity.) of God accompanied with women, and begat sons that proved unjust, and despisers of all that was good, on account of the confidence they had in their own strength; for the tradition is, that these men did what resembled the acts of those whom the Grecians call giants” – Josephus
The view that these Nephilim were son’s of Seth was not embraced by Jewish theologians until the middle-ages. Prior to this, Jewish tradition held that the Nephilim were fallen angels. The view that the Nephilim are products of the descendents of Seth is particularly popular among those who seek to allegorize many stories of the bible in favor of “rationalism”. For those who hold the bible to be divinely inspired and literal, this belief cannot hold weight.
The Book of Enoch
The book of Enoch is an ancient Jewish text. The earliest known copy that exists dates to around 300 BC, however it is thought to have its origins from oral tradition dating to the time of Job. The writer of the story seems to indicate it was written before the Flood. While I do not advocate for treating this book as canonical, it is still useful as a historical text much like the works of Josephus. Additionally Jude references the book in 1:14-15, lending some integrity to the book. The book calls these fallen angels “Watchers” and adds more detail to the biblical account of the Nephilim and their descendents.
Another text that is not canon but references fallen angels is the book of Jubilees, although one Egyptian copy of the text states that the Nephilim are son’s of Seth. This one discrepancy between texts can be seen as a distortion of the original text. Additionally, the book of Giants tells some interesting history of the descendents of the Nephilim. These texts together are not anything I would recommend hanging church doctrine on alone, however, when added to the weight of scripture, seems to confirm that Nephilim are fallen angels and their descendents were in fact giant creatures with evil intent.
There is some confusion among believers about the identity of the Nephilim. First of all, the first biblical reference of Nephilim are in Gen 6:4.
- “The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.” Gen 6:4
These are hybrids apparently from the union between the “sons of God” and human women. It is a common view that these “son’s of God” are decedents of Seth and “moral women”. This can be easily disproven by a closer look at the bible.
First – It is always true that you should let the bible interpret the bible. Always look at the context.
- “.. the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. Then the Lord said, “My Spirit will not contend witha humans forever, for they are mortalb ; their days will be a hundred and twenty years.”Gen 6:2-3
If these offspring of the “son’s of God” are acceptable to God, why does he then say “my spirit will not always contend with man?” and then limit their life-span? Next we read:
- “The Lord saw how great the wickedness of the human race had become on the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time. The Lord regretted that he had made human beings on the earth, and his heart was deeply troubled. So the Lord said, “I will wipe from the face of the earth the human race I have created—and with them the animals, the birds and the creatures that move along the ground—for I regret that I have made them.” But Noah found favor in the eyes of the Lord.”
Additionally, Jesus clarifies the situation for us:
- “Jesus answered and said unto them, ‘Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.’ Matt 22: 29-30
By this scripture we can easily infer that angels were not to marry therefore if it was done in Gen 6, then it was not an action condoned by God and therefore it was evil, and any offspring from such a union would also be evil.
Next we read immediately after the son’s of God began taking wives, that God was so angry that he wipes out every living being except those who were in the Ark. We find that Noah finds favor because his lineage is not corrupted with intermarriage with angels. If these offspring were the decedents of Seth and “moral women” would not God have saved them?
Furthermore Peter writes, “For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;” (2Pe 2:4) Again, what was the sin of the angels mentioned here that they were judged for? Could it be that they mated with humans as mentioned in Gen 6? Jud 1:6-7 seems to confirm this.
The Hebrew word for Nephilim (נָפִיל) is is actually GIANT. We also find the exact same word mentioned in later times:
- And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight. Num 13:33
By this scripture we learn that the Nephilim really are giants as opposed to a non-literal translation. We also find that they have supernatural origin since they did not all parish in the flood. We further have evidence that they are not approved of by the Lord because he instructs the children of Israel to wipe them out completely. By this we can further deduce that angels who do not do the will of God can be classified as “fallen angels” and therefore the term “Nephilim” can be interpreted as a word for fallen angels.
Additionally we can read that by the time of Numbers 13, there were several classifications of these offspring.
- Emim (fearful ones)
- Rephaim (dead one’s or buzzing ones)
- Anakim (long necked one’s) and
Anikim – We can find them mentioned in Deut 2:10-11, 21, Deu 9:2, Jos 11:21-22, Jos 14:12, 15, Jos 15:13-14, Jos 21:11 and Judges 1:20. In all of these references, the Lord instructed the Israelites to utterly destroy and dispossess the Anikim from the land. We find in Deut 2:10-11 that Emim was the Moabite word for the Anikim. Clearly the Moabites were also frightened by the Anikims.
The Raphaim’s also were destroyed by God himself! How could this be if they were not unnatural abominations of nature?
- “That also was accounted a land of giants: giants dwelt therein in old time; and the Ammonites call them Zamzummims; A people great, and many, and tall, as the Anakims; but the LORD destroyed them before them; and they succeeded them, and dwelt in their stead:” Deut 2:21-22
Apparently they were named zamzummims by the Ammonites because of the sound of their language, which sounded like buzzing. Again, it is clear they were feared and unnatural.
This article continues on part 2 of 2.